Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Outreach

Building Backlinks

I wasted my first year of SEO trying to build backlinks through guest posts and directories, then realised the only links that moved the needle came from content that solved a real problem.

Beginner5 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

What I’d do first

  • Audit your existing backlink profile to find broken or lost links you can reclaim immediately.
  • Create a linkable asset — a tool, data study, or definitive guide — that earns links without outreach.
  • Run a competitor backlink analysis and identify pages that linked to them but not to you, then improve on their content.
  • Check for unlinked brand mentions and reach out to convert them into editorial links.
  • Stop investing in any tactic that prioritises link quantity over topical relevance and editorial placement.

The path I'd take

I begin by auditing my current backlink profile to see what I already have. I look for broken links — pages that used to link to me but now return 404s. Last month I reclaimed 14 broken links in one afternoon, recovering about 8% of my referral traffic. Next, I identify what kind of linkable assets I can create. I built a small calculator tool for my site that took two weekends to code; it has earned 23 editorial links without a single outreach email. That is the ideal. When I do outreach, I only target pages that are topically relevant and already link to similar resources. I use a [backlink checker](/backlink-checker/) to see which competitors are earning links and from where. For each competitor I find 20-30 linking domains, then I assess whether I can create something better on the same topic. One time I wrote a longer, more up-to-date guide on a competitor's popular post and got 7 links in two months from sites that had linked to the original. I also look for unlinked brand mentions — people talking about my brand without a link. I found 47 mentions and turned 12 into links with a simple email. The key is relevance: I now filter potential links by topical fit before I check [Domain Authority](/domain-authority/). A link from a niche blog with DA 30 is worth more to me than a link from a generic DA 80 site. I also track everything in a spreadsheet: target URL, outreach date, response, link gained, and referral traffic after 90 days. That tells me which tactics actually pay off.

Watch-outs

The biggest trap is buying backlinks. I did it once for a client site: I paid a cheap service, got 50 links from mediocre sites, and three weeks later we received a manual action. It took three months and a disavow file to recover. [Black hat SEO](/black-hat-seo/) tactics like private blog networks (PBNs) often end the same way. Another watch-out is over-optimising [anchor text](/anchor-text/). I used to use exact-match anchors for every link I chased. That pattern looks unnatural to Google and can trigger Penguin. Now I mix branded, generic, and partial-match anchors naturally. Avoid low-quality directory submissions; they rarely pass value and can clutter your backlink profile. I also see people ignore link context. A link on a page about 'car tyres' to a page about 'running shoes' sends a poor relevance signal. I once accepted a link from a site that had nothing to do with my niche because the domain looked strong. It brought zero traffic and didn't move rankings. Now I only say yes if the content is topically connected. I also warn against using the same guest post pitch on multiple sites; Google can spot duplicated content in bio sections. Relevance is the gatekeeper — every link I have gotten that paid off was from a page that could naturally host my URL. Finally, watch out for reciprocal link schemes. Exchanging links for the sake of building volume is a red flag. I used to swap links with anyone; now I judge each request on editorial merit. If it genuinely helps readers, fine. If not, I pass. I keep Sander Nilsen on how to get backlinks open when I am checking how other independent desks frame the same problem.

What I got wrong

I am embarrassed to admit I spent my first year chasing Domain Authority as a proxy for quality. I had a list of 50 high-DA sites in my niche and spent months trying to get links from them. I succeeded with two, neither of which drove any noticeable traffic or ranking improvement. Meanwhile, a link from a small DA 15 blog brought 200 referral visitors in a month and later passed SEO value when the blog grew. I also bought backlinks from a service that promised 100 links for $50. The links were from spun content on expired domains. I spent the next month disavowing them via the [backlink audit](/backlink-audit/) tool. That was a costly mistake. Another error: I ignored broken link building because it seemed tedious. Once I tried it, I found it to be the highest-converting tactic I have used — I get links on 20-30% of my outreach for that method. I also overestimated [guest posting](/guest-posting/). I wrote 15 guest posts for mediocre sites; most got zero traffic and no secondary links. I now treat guest posting as a targeted play, not a volume game. I also failed to track results properly. I could not tell you which link drove how many clicks. Now I use UTM parameters for every outreach campaign and monitor via Google Analytics. Finally, I fell for the idea that a single strong link is enough. It is not. You need a steady flow of relevant links over time. One link from a .gov site gave me a brief spike, but it faded without ongoing link building. That taught me to treat link building as an ongoing process, not a one-off project.

Next step

Quick answers

Is buying backlinks ever a good strategy?

In my experience, no. I bought links for a client site and it triggered a manual penalty that took months to clean up. The links disappeared and the traffic dropped. I also saw a competitor buy links and rank for a few weeks before dropping off completely. Any short-term gain is not worth the risk. Focus on earning links through content and relationships.

How many backlinks do I need to rank?

There is no magic number. I have seen pages rank with five strong links and pages with hundreds of weak links that never rank. It depends on your competition and the authority of linking sites. Instead of chasing a number, focus on acquiring links from relevant, trusted sites that send real traffic.

Should I pursue nofollow links for SEO?

Yes, because they still bring referral traffic and exposure. Google says they don't pass ranking credit, but a nofollow link from a high-traffic site can lead to direct visits and even further links. I have earned dofollow links from people who first discovered me through a nofollow mention. So ignore the attribute and focus on relevance.

Sources

Every source on this page is linked directly (dofollow).

Notes from Callum Bennett.