Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Tool lab

Gratis SEO Verktyg

I used to think free SEO tools were a compromise, but after three years of testing, I now see they cover 80% of what a small site actually needs.

Beginner3 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

Start here

  • Verify your site in Google Search Console first — it gives you query data no paid tool can replicate.
  • Run a free Screaming Frog crawl on any site under 500 pages to catch missing titles and broken links.
  • Use Google Keyword Planner with a dummy campaign to get real search volume estimates, not just ranges.
  • Install Microsoft Clarity alongside Google Analytics to see actual user scroll maps for free.

Plain-English take

Gratis SEO verktyg is the Swedish phrase for free SEO tools, and in practice it means the same set of browser tabs I open every morning: Google Search Console, Google Analytics, Bing Webmaster Tools, Screaming Frog (free edition), PageSpeed Insights, and sometimes a keyword planner. You do not need a paid subscription to improve a small site's rankings. I have seen pages jump from position 15 to position 3 by fixing a crawl error that Search Console flagged, then adding a meta description the tool told me was missing. That work cost me exactly zero kronor.

What these tools share is that they come from the platforms themselves — Google, Bing, the browser vendors — or from developers who cap features to keep the free tier honest. Screaming Frog's free version lets you crawl up to 500 URLs, which covers roughly 90% of the personal blogs and local business sites I audit. For everything past that limit, I use a combination of [Screaming Frog](/screaming-frog/) on a subfolder or I switch to a command-line crawler. The trade-off is speed: a full site audit on a 200-page site takes about four minutes with the free tool, whereas the paid version does it in thirty seconds. I will take the extra three minutes to avoid a monthly bill.

I have also stopped ignoring Bing Webmaster Tools. For years I treated it as a Google clone, but it surfaces different crawl errors and has a cleaner interface for tracking backlinks. I link it to [Bing Webmaster Tools](/bing-webmaster-tools/) from every new site now. The real surprise was how much I could learn from [Google Trends](/google-trends/) about seasonality — it shows interest by region and time, which no keyword tool gives for free. My plain-English summary is this: start with the platform's own free tool, add one specialty crawler, and only reach for a paid option when you need data at scale or competitor crossover.

When it actually matters

Free tools matter most during the first six months of a site's life, when budgets are tight and ranking signals are still thin. I have onboarded three clients who spent money on Semrush before they even verified their property in Search Console. That is backwards. The first move should always be the free diagnostic, not the paid dashboard. For a 50-page portfolio site, Google Search Console and [Website Speed Test](/website-speed-test/) will find every technical blocker. I once traced a 40% crawl budget waste to a single redirect chain that PageSpeed Insights highlighted; the fix took ten minutes and I charged nothing.

But free tools matter less when you need to analyse competitors at scale. If you are trying to reverse-engineer the link profile of a site with 10,000 referring domains, the free tier of Ahrefs Webmaster Tools only shows a limited sample. I hit that wall myself last year and had to borrow a friend's paid account for an afternoon. The edge case that always surprises me is local SEO: free tools from Google My Business and [Hotjar](/hotjar/) (which has a free plan for up to 35 daily sessions) give you enough data to optimise a single location, but they break when you manage multiple branches. For a single café, Hotjar's free heatmaps show exactly where users hesitate on the menu page. For a chain of twenty cafés, you need something like BrightLocal.

I also rely on [Se Ranking](/se-ranking/) for rank tracking — their free version lets you monitor ten keywords across one search engine, which is enough for a niche site. The moment I need to track 50 keywords across Google and Bing, I pay. The rule I use: free tools are sufficient when your total tracked keywords are under 20 and your site is smaller than 200 pages. Beyond that, you are spending time instead of money, and time is the resource I started valuing more after my first year in SEO.

What I got wrong

I spent my first six months running SEO on a client site believing that Google Keyword Planner was the only free keyword source worth using. What I got wrong was ignoring Google Trends entirely. Keyword Planner gives you monthly averages; Trends shows you the week someone started searching for "gratis seo verktyg" in Swedish and when interest peaks. I missed a seasonal spike in January for a budget travel site because I only looked at Keyword Planner's twelve-month aggregation. I now pair both tools before deciding which keywords to target.

Another mistake was assuming that free tools cannot give you on-page optimisation guidance. I used to think yoast SEO (which is free) only added meta boxes, but its traffic light analysis for readability and keyword density is genuinely useful — provided you ignore the strict rules about exact-match keywords. I also underestimated how much data you can extract from Google Analytics 4 without paying for a premium tool. The free version tracks user behaviour, session duration, and conversion paths for up to 10 million hits per month. I hit that limit once, but for a typical small site it is effectively unlimited.

The admission that still bothers me: I recommended a free rank tracker to a client who then missed a ranking drop because the tool updated data every three days instead of daily. Free trackers often have stale data, and if you are running time-sensitive campaigns, that lag costs you. I now tell clients to use [Similarweb](/similarweb/) for trend direction rather than precise rank positions. My lesson was that free does not mean real-time, and for some decisions, you must accept the delay or pay for speed.

Next step

Quick answers

Is Google Search Console completely free, or are there hidden costs?

It is entirely free. Google does not charge for Search Console. You only need to verify ownership of your domain. There is no premium tier, and the data includes impressions, clicks, average position, and coverage errors. I have used it for years without paying a single krona.

Can I do proper technical SEO with only free tools?

Yes, for sites under 500 pages and simple architectures. The free version of Screaming Frog catches missing titles, duplicate content, and broken links. Google PageSpeed Insights covers Core Web Vitals. For larger sites you need the paid Screaming Frog or a subscription to a cloud crawler like Sitebulb.

Which free tool gives the best competitor analysis?

None of the free tools give full competitor analysis. Similarweb shows estimated traffic and top channels for free, but the data is aggregated and lags by weeks. For backlinks, Bing Webmaster Tools shows your own links but not your competitors'. I often use Google Trends to compare brand interest over time as a proxy.

Sources

Primary documentation is linked directly. Anything commercial is marked nofollow.

  • Google Search Central — Official documentation for Search Console, indexing, and crawl recommendations I referenced in the note.
  • Google Search Console About — Primary source confirming the tool measures queries, errors, and index status for free.
  • Google Analytics Support — Used to verify the free tier limit of 10 million hits per month and behaviour tracking features.
  • Google PageSpeed Insights — Source for the Core Web Vitals and speed diagnostics I mention in the section on technical SEO.

Notes from Callum Bennett.