Skip to content
Searchpedia SEO field notes Callum Bennett Callum

Outreach

PBN Networks

I would only touch a PBN after six months of failed outreach, and even then I treat every link like it might get reviewed tomorrow.

Beginner3 min readUpdated 2026-07-27Notes by Callum Bennett

What I’d do first

  • Audit every aged domain's backlink profile for penalties before you buy it.
  • Give each PBN site original content and a unique hosting setup to minimise footprints.
  • Spread links across multiple pages on your money site, not just the homepage.
  • Wait at least three months after publishing before adding your first money-site link.
  • Use PBN links only as a supplement to earned outreach links, never as your sole strategy.

The path I'd take

I do not start with a PBN. I spend three to six months on [guest posting](/guest-posting/) and [digital PR](/digital-pr/) first. If those channels are failing to produce enough links for a competitive niche, then I consider a PBN. But I do it methodically.

First, I source aged domains with a clean history. I run each candidate through a [backlink checker](/backlink-checker/) and look for three things: no links from gambling or adult sites, no sudden drop in referring domains (that often signals a penalty), and a backlink profile that includes some editorial links from relevant sites. I also check the Wayback Machine to see what the site used to publish. A site that was previously about finance linking to a pet store is a mismatch I avoid.

Let me walk through a real example. I bought a domain that had been a home renovation blog. It had 12 referring domains, all from home improvement forums or local builder sites. No spam. The domain was three years old and still had a clean Ahrefs DR of 14. I restored a simple WordPress site using that same topic, wrote ten high-quality articles about tiling and plumbing, and waited four months before adding any links. Then I added a single contextual link from an article about roof repairs to my client's roofing service page. The [anchor text](/anchor-text/) was branded: "Smith Roofing". That page moved from position 18 to 4 in eight weeks. Not dramatic, but steady.

I spread the links across three different target pages on the money site, not just the home page. Each PBN site gets no more than two links total, and I never link from one PBN site to another. That creates a footprint I do not want. I also vary the hosting: some on DigitalOcean, some on SiteGround, some on cheap shared hosting that appears natural.

The key decision rule: if the domain costs more than $200, I walk away. Cheap domains with decent backlink profiles exist, but you have to dig. I use expired domain marketplaces and filter by DR, referring domains, and niche. I also check the domain against Google Search Console data if I can get it from the seller. That is rare but worth paying extra for.

I am not advocating PBNs as a first choice. They are a calculated risk. But if you control every detail, the risk shrinks.

Watch-outs

The biggest trap is thinking any expired domain will do. I have seen colleagues buy domains that looked clean on paper – good DR, no obvious spam – but after a few weeks the site got deindexed. That usually means a hidden manual action from the previous owner. Always check the domain in Google Search Console if possible, or at least search site:domain.com to see if the old content is still indexed. If it is not, walk away.

Footprints are the second big risk. If all your PBN sites share the same hosting provider, the same WordPress theme, the same plugin set, or even the same site structure (about page, privacy page, contact page in the same order), Google's algorithms can cluster them. I have seen sites lose rankings because the PBN network was too uniform. I vary registration dates, use different name servers, and even add non-SEO content like a personal blog post about fishing on one site to make it look owned by a real person.

Anchor text over-optimisation is another minefield. I used to think a perfect mix of exact match, partial match, branded, and generic anchors would fool the algorithm. It did not. After an update, the PBN links I had built with too many exact-match anchors lost all weight. Now I keep exact-match under 5% of my total link profile across the whole money site, not just from PBNs. I use branded and URL anchors mostly.

Link velocity from PBNs is a flag. If you buy a domain, publish ten posts in a week, and start linking to your money site immediately, that pattern is detectable. I have seen sites get manual reviews because the [backlink profile](/backlink-profile/) showed a sudden spike from new domains. I stretch the building over several months and never add more than three links from PBN sites in a single month.

Also watch out for interlinking between PBN sites. Some operators link their PBNs together to boost their authority. That is a dead giveaway. I keep each PBN site completely isolated. They do not even share the same Google Analytics account.

Finally, do not ignore the content. Thin, spun, or gibberish content on a PBN site might not seem important because the page is not meant for human readers, but Google still crawls it. If the content is clearly nonsense, the site can be flagged as low-quality and the links may lose value or incur a penalty. Write decent, readable articles of at least 500 words.

What I got wrong

I made a classic beginner mistake: I bought a cheap expired domain with a solid DR of 27 and no visible spam. I did not dig deep enough. The domain had a previous owner who used it for a gambling redirect site. Google had issued a manual action that was not showing up in the standard free tools. I only found out when I built the site, submitted it to Search Console, and got a warning within a week. The domain was useless. I lost $40 and two weeks of setup time. Now I always run a Paid Search Console test or at least check the domain's index status before buying.

Second mistake: I linked from every PBN post to my money site. I thought: "Why waste a good post without linking?" The result was a backlink profile that looked unnatural – ten new links from a single domain, all pointing to the same money site page, within a month. After a core update, that page dropped from position 6 to 45. I had to disavow the entire domain to recover. I should have spread those links across multiple PBN sites and over time.

Third mistake: I ignored content quality on the PBN. I spun some articles using a cheap tool and posted them. Google crawled them, indexed them, and then the whole PBN site got a manual action for thin content. The links lost all value. I now write original content for every PBN site. It takes longer, but the links last longer.

Fourth mistake: I used the same IP range for all my PBN sites. I thought a different C-class subnet would be enough, but the hosting company's server block was on the same /24 network. Google picked up on the common IP range. I now use different hosting companies, not just different plans.

What I still get wrong: I still occasionally buy a domain that looks great but has a weird history no tool catches. I also still underestimate how long it takes to safely build a PBN. I want fast results, but patience is the only way to avoid penalties.

Next step

Quick answers

Can PBNs ever be safe from Google penalties?

No. Google's spam policies explicitly prohibit artificial link schemes. Even a well-run PBN violates those policies. The risk can be reduced but never eliminated. I only use PBNs when the upside outweighs the likelihood of a penalty, which is rare.

How many PBN links should I build to a single money site page?

I limit each PBN domain to one link, and I spread links across at least three different pages on the money site. In total, I keep PBN links below 10% of the site's entire backlink profile. Anything more starts looking like a footprint.

What is worse: a PBN with spammy content or a PBN with perfect content?

Spammy content is worse because it can get the PBN site deindexed, carrying the links down. Perfect content reduces that risk but the unnatural link pattern remains. Neither is safe. The content needs to be good enough to pass a manual review, but the placement is the real weakness.

Sources

Primary documentation is linked directly. Anything commercial is marked nofollow.

Notes from Callum Bennett.